Difference between revisions of "NLCD Land Cover"
HamishBowman (talk | contribs) (→About: spearfish metadata explains some) |
HamishBowman (talk | contribs) (+refs) |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
For using as a basis for Manning's n friction coefficients, you can make a reclass map with ''r.reclass''. The module will only reclass as integers so the table below is reclassed into parts per thousand. Crop your area of interest with r.mapcalc and divide by 1000.0 at the same time to get the Mannings n number. | For using as a basis for Manning's n friction coefficients, you can make a reclass map with ''r.reclass''. The module will only reclass as integers so the table below is reclassed into parts per thousand. Crop your area of interest with r.mapcalc and divide by 1000.0 at the same time to get the Mannings n number. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Actual values for your location will vary widely, the following is simply a starting point. | ||
: ''TODO: values of 999 require values from the literature'' | : ''TODO: values of 999 require values from the literature'' | ||
Line 104: | Line 106: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
0 = 0 Unclassified | 0 = 0 Unclassified | ||
− | 11 = | + | 11 = 0250 Open Water |
− | 12 = 999 Perennial Snow/Ice | + | 12 = 999(low) Perennial Snow/Ice |
21 = 0404 Developed, Open Space | 21 = 0404 Developed, Open Space | ||
22 = 0678 Developed, Low Intensity | 22 = 0678 Developed, Low Intensity | ||
Line 117: | Line 119: | ||
71 = 3680 Herbaceous | 71 = 3680 Herbaceous | ||
81 = 3250 Hay/Pasture | 81 = 3250 Hay/Pasture | ||
− | 82 = | + | 82 = 0375 Cultivated Crops |
90 = 0860 Woody Wetlands | 90 = 0860 Woody Wetlands | ||
95 = 1825 Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands | 95 = 1825 Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | References: | ||
+ | * [http://www.fsl.orst.edu/geowater/FX3/help/8_Hydraulic_Reference/Mannings_n_Tables.htm Ven Te Chow, 1959] (ORST.edu) | ||
+ | * [https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2339/report.pdf USGS's Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains] | ||
+ | * Liu, Zhu & Merwade, Venkatesh & Jafarzadegan, Keighobad. (2018). ''Investigating the role of model structure and surface roughness in generating flood inundation extents using 1D and 2D hydraulic models.'' Journal of Flood Risk Management. e12347. 10.1111/jfr3.12347. | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 21:11, 1 July 2019
Contents
About
- Raster grid covering the Continental US at 30 meter resolution
From the Spearfish dataset's landcover.30m history file:
- National Land Cover Data Set NLCD, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
- The NLCD was compiled from Landsat TM imagery (circa 1992) with a spatial resolution of 30 meters supplemented by various ancillary data (where available). The satellite images were analyzed and interpreted by using very large, sometimes multi-State, image mosaics (that is, up to 18 Landsat scenes). Because a relatively small number of aerial photographs were necessarily conducted from a broad spatial perspective. Furthermore, the accuracy assessments correspond to Federal Regions, which are groupings of contiguous States. Thus, the reliability of the data is greatest at the State or multi-State level. The statistical accuracy of the data is known only for the region.
Obtaining data from the USGS
The classic Spearfish GRASS sample dataset contains a landcover.30m raster map which is an excerpt from an older version of the NLCD dataset.
- Download site: https://www.mrlc.gov/data
- Data is provided in ERDAS Imagine .img format.
- As of April 2019 the zipped dataset is a 1.4 GB.
- Create an Albers location
- this can also be done automatically with the Location Wizard using the downloaded .img file.
Here are the values for the CONUS dataset:
name: Albers Equal Area proj: aea datum: wgs84 ellps: wgs84 lat_1: 29.5 lat_2: 45.5 lat_0: 23 lon_0: -96 x_0: 0 y_0: 0 towgs84: 0,0,0,0,0,0,0 no_defs: defined
- It is very large, connect to it with r.external then crop out the section you need with g.region and r.mapcalc.
Categories
These can be applied with the r.category module.
0:Unclassified 11:Open Water 12:Perennial Snow/Ice 21:Developed, Open Space 22:Developed, Low Intensity 23:Developed, Medium Intensity 24:Developed, High Intensity 31:Barren Land 41:Deciduous Forest 42:Evergreen Forest 43:Mixed Forest 52:Shrub/Scrub 71:Herbaceous 81:Hay/Pasture 82:Cultivated Crops 90:Woody Wetlands 95:Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands
Colors
These should load in automatically, but if they don't here are the official colors which you can load in with the r.colors module's rules= option:
11 70:107:159 12 209:222:248 21 222:197:197 22 217:146:130 23 235:0:0 24 171:0:0 31 179:172:159 41 104:171:95 42 28:95:44 43 181:197:143 52 204:184:121 71 223:223:194 81 220:217:57 82 171:108:40 90 184:217:235 95 108:159:184
Legend
Use the -n and -c flags of d.legend to limit the legend to named categories.
Manning's n
For using as a basis for Manning's n friction coefficients, you can make a reclass map with r.reclass. The module will only reclass as integers so the table below is reclassed into parts per thousand. Crop your area of interest with r.mapcalc and divide by 1000.0 at the same time to get the Mannings n number.
Actual values for your location will vary widely, the following is simply a starting point.
- TODO: values of 999 require values from the literature
0 = 0 Unclassified 11 = 0250 Open Water 12 = 999(low) Perennial Snow/Ice 21 = 0404 Developed, Open Space 22 = 0678 Developed, Low Intensity 23 = 0678 Developed, Medium Intensity 24 = 0404 Developed, High Intensity 31 = 0113 Barren Land 41 = 3600 Deciduous Forest 42 = 3200 Evergreen Forest 43 = 4000 Mixed Forest 52 = 4000 Shrub/Scrub 71 = 3680 Herbaceous 81 = 3250 Hay/Pasture 82 = 0375 Cultivated Crops 90 = 0860 Woody Wetlands 95 = 1825 Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands
References:
- Ven Te Chow, 1959 (ORST.edu)
- USGS's Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains
- Liu, Zhu & Merwade, Venkatesh & Jafarzadegan, Keighobad. (2018). Investigating the role of model structure and surface roughness in generating flood inundation extents using 1D and 2D hydraulic models. Journal of Flood Risk Management. e12347. 10.1111/jfr3.12347.