Difference between revisions of "Performance comparison GRASS vs. ArcGIS"

From GRASS-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(add see also section)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}}
 
{{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}}
 
{{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}}
 
{{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}}
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
* [[GRASS GIS Performance]]

Revision as of 13:52, 3 January 2019

Vector buffer (special case)

Task: Create buffer around vector polygon with negative distance
Input data: Vector layer 'StatPolygon' from ArcCR500 dataset
Comparison: Windows Server Enterprise • Intel Xeon CPU E5520 2.27GHz 2.26GHz (2 processors) • 8GB • 64bit OS
  • GRASS 7: v.buffer input=StatPolygon output=Stat_5000 distance=-500012sec
  • ArcGIS 10.2.0: Buffer StatPolygon Stat_5000 "-5000 Meters" FULL ROUND NONE6min 50sec
Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)
Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)

See also