Performance comparison GRASS vs. ArcGIS: Difference between revisions

From GRASS-Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add see also section)
(+Clipping Contest Benchmark)
Line 11: Line 11:
{{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}}
{{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}}
{{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}}
{{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}}
== Clipping Contest Benchmark ==
ContourClipTest with ArcGIS, QGIS, GlobalMapper, Manifold, JGRASS ... (tests done in 2011):
https://courses.neteler.org/arcgis-vs-qgis-etc-clipping-contest-rematch-revisited/


== See also ==
== See also ==


* [[GRASS GIS Performance]]
* [[GRASS GIS Performance]]

Revision as of 16:29, 4 January 2019

Vector buffer (special case)

Task: Create buffer around vector polygon with negative distance
Input data: Vector layer 'StatPolygon' from ArcCR500 dataset
Comparison: Windows Server Enterprise • Intel Xeon CPU E5520 2.27GHz 2.26GHz (2 processors) • 8GB • 64bit OS
  • GRASS 7: v.buffer input=StatPolygon output=Stat_5000 distance=-500012sec
  • ArcGIS 10.2.0: Buffer StatPolygon Stat_5000 "-5000 Meters" FULL ROUND NONE6min 50sec
Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)
Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)


Clipping Contest Benchmark

ContourClipTest with ArcGIS, QGIS, GlobalMapper, Manifold, JGRASS ... (tests done in 2011):

https://courses.neteler.org/arcgis-vs-qgis-etc-clipping-contest-rematch-revisited/

See also