|
|
| (7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| This page discusses the need for a GRASS Project Steering Commitee (PSC), preferably at a low level of complication.
| | {{MovedToTrac|PSC}} |
| | |
| ==1st Letter to GRASS mailing lists==
| |
| | |
| <small><pre>
| |
| 02/10/2006 06:15 PM
| |
| Dear GRASS community,
| |
| | |
| in the Chicago meeting the GRASS project was suggested to
| |
| as one of the initial OSGeo foundation projects.
| |
| | |
| So far I only received positive feedback on the idea of
| |
| moving GRASS more formally to the foundation (while the
| |
| individual authors are keeping their copyright which is
| |
| a major difference to the Apache Foundation.)
| |
| | |
| A couple of things will have to be sorted out in the
| |
| coming months to make GRASS's membership possible (below
| |
| list is inspired by Frank's mail to the GRASS project):
| |
| | |
| o We will need to form a "GRASS Project Steering Committee"
| |
| (PSC). Foundation projects need a formalized management
| |
| which may be desired in any case. I would be glad to
| |
| receive suggestions of names for this committee. For
| |
| inspiration, please look at the MapServer Technical
| |
| Steering Committee as described here:
| |
| | |
| http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-1
| |
| | |
| o One benefit of the foundation is some degree of legal
| |
| support and protection for the project. The flip side of that
| |
| is that the foundation needs to ensure some degree of
| |
| rigor and process in how code comes into the project. One
| |
| part of that is getting committers to sign a legal agreement
| |
| indicating that they agree that changes they commit will
| |
| be under the license of GRASS (GPL) and that they have
| |
| the right to submit the code (they wrote it, it is not
| |
| patented, have permission from their employer, etc).
| |
| | |
| o We will have to review the existing code base (which is
| |
| huge - more than 500000 lines of source code in GRASS 6).
| |
| Luckily a major code review was already done for GRASS 5.
| |
| Also the "Debianization" process was performed for GRASS
| |
| 5 and GRASS 6.
| |
| | |
| o It is suggested to move the support infrastructure for GRASS
| |
| to new foundation systems. Stuff like CVS (maybe SVN then),
| |
| and bugtracker and mailing lists. The web site will also
| |
| likely appear under a foundation subdomain (ie. grass.osgeo.org)
| |
| with hopefully the known mirror site structure as before
| |
| with grass.itc.it, grass.ibiblio.org etc as principal mirror
| |
| sites. If so, the web site will be migrated into a contents
| |
| management system (CMS) in a harmonized "foundation style".
| |
| A CMS will hopefully solve the problem to get more people
| |
| involved in the Web site contents management.
| |
| | |
| o We hope to establish options to enable sponorship for the
| |
| foundation - be as direct funding or for selected foundation
| |
| projects. Details have to be worked out. My suggestion is to
| |
| create national tax-exempt organizations (such as the
| |
| German GRASS Anwender-Vereinigung e.V. which already exists)
| |
| which may offer to receive donations.
| |
| | |
| o For now we should think about nominating people with
| |
| recognized contribution to the GRASS project, to
| |
| free data, to whatever deems significant. A small paragraph
| |
| describing why the candidate is proposed as member to
| |
| the foundation is needed as well. This will be announced
| |
| more formally soon. Please see ongoing discussions here:
| |
| http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
| |
| | |
| (Nearly) nothing is set in stone yet.
| |
| More details will follow, a couple of official documents
| |
| are being currently prepared
| |
| | |
| Your feedback is welcome.
| |
| | |
| Markus
| |
| </pre></small>
| |
| ______
| |
| | |
| ==2nd Letter to GRASS mailing lists==
| |
| | |
| <small><pre>
| |
| 02/11/2006 12:16 AM
| |
| Dear all,
| |
| | |
| while I already received two suggestions for a GRASS
| |
| Project Steering Committee (PSC), I suggest to post the
| |
| nominations in public, if there are no objections.
| |
| I would like to have that transparent to everyone.
| |
| | |
| Nominations should contain the name and a short paragraph
| |
| why it is a good candidate. We also have to decide,
| |
| how many members the PSC should have.
| |
| | |
| It is worth reading
| |
| - http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
| |
| (they are very successful, and the document applies much
| |
| to the GRASS project culture)
| |
| | |
| - http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-1/
| |
| (MS RFC 1: Technical Steering Committee Guidelines)
| |
| apparently 7 members there.
| |
| | |
| - http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2006-February/thread.html#7881
| |
| (GDAL PSC to be formed)
| |
| | |
| - http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-10/
| |
| (MS RFC 10: Joining the Open Source Geospatial Foundation)
| |
| | |
| Related:
| |
| - https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9682788&forum_id=475
| |
| (Community MapBuilder PMC membership nomination)
| |
| - https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9673493&forum_id=475
| |
| (MapBuilder & Mapbender and the OSGeo Foundation)
| |
| | |
| In fact, there is lot of material to digest in these days..
| |
| | |
| Markus
| |
| </pre></small>
| |
| | |
| ==3rd Letter to GRASS Dev mailing list==
| |
| | |
| <small><pre>
| |
| Markus Neteler neteler at itc.it Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:10:25 +0200
| |
| | |
| On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:00:01PM +0100, Glynn Clements wrote:
| |
| ...
| |
| > Alpha support in the current display architecture isn't going to
| |
| > happen (I reverted the last attempt to add it, and will do likewise in
| |
| > future).
| |
| | |
| ... this is why I really suggest to get interested in a project
| |
| steering committee [1], [2].
| |
| | |
| Instead of recursively reverted changes of other developers,
| |
| we should come up with a design discussion and then *vote* on it.
| |
| At least for such crucidal pieces of the code I would like to
| |
| see less anarchy and a more formal approach. This will render
| |
| development more transparent to everybody. The scope cannot be to
| |
| have two display management systems in parallel, one without
| |
| and one with alpha support.
| |
| | |
| Existing steering committees, to get inspired from:
| |
| Mapserver: http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-1
| |
| GDAL: http://www.gdal.org/rfc1_pmc.html
| |
| Mapbender: http://www.mapbender.org/index.php/Mapbender_PSC
| |
| ...
| |
| | |
| Please think about it!
| |
| | |
| Thanks
| |
| | |
| Markus
| |
| | |
| [1] http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2006-February/021178.html
| |
| [2] http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2006-April/022185.html
| |
| | |
| </pre></small>
| |
| | |
| Answers:
| |
| | |
| * http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2006-April/022429.html
| |
| | |
| == Nominations ==
| |
| | |
| ''The comments were copied from the [http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?userPosts=y&user=449164&query=psc&sort=date related emails].''
| |
| | |
| # Brad Douglas (nominated by 11): for clone removal and code refactoring
| |
| # Cedric Shock (nominated by 11): various code contributions
| |
| # Dylan Beaudette (nominated by 4): deep commitment to community, publishes useful tips
| |
| # Glynn Clements (nominated by 1): for his vast knowledge of standards, practices and compatibility
| |
| # Hamish Bowman (nominated by 11): for documentation, integration, and various modules
| |
| # Helena Mitasova (nominated by 1): for the obvious
| |
| # Maciej Sieczka (nominated by 5):
| |
| # Markus Neteler (nominated by 14): for the obvious. :-)
| |
| # Michael Barton (nominated by 12): very responsive to comments and questions; various code contributions
| |
| # Paolo Zatelli (nominated by 1 ): no reason given
| |
| # Paul Kelly (nominated by 11): for PROJ and platform support
| |
| # Radim Blazek (nominated by 1): for his extensive GRASS work including vector and DBMS support
| |
| # Roger Bivand (nominated by 7): no reason given
| |
| # Venkatesh Raghavan (nominated by 9):
| |
| # Massimiliano Cannata (nominated by 1):
| |
| | |
| Declined (please reconsider =])
| |
| # Radim Blazek (nominated by 1): for his extensive GRASS work including vector and DBMS support
| |
| | |
| == Status September 2006 ==
| |
| | |
| '''The GRASS Project Steering Committee ([[PSC]])'''
| |
| | |
| * '''Michael Barton''' (michael barton * asu edu)
| |
| * '''Dylan Baudette''' (debeaudette * ucdavis edu)
| |
| * '''Hamish Bowman''' (hamish_nospam * yahoo com)
| |
| * '''Massimiliano Cannata''' (massimiliano cannata * supsi ch)
| |
| * '''Brad Douglas''' (rez * touchofmadness com)
| |
| * '''Paul Kelly''' (paul-grass stjohnspoint co uk)
| |
| * '''Helena Mitasova''' (hmitaso * unity ncsu edu)
| |
| * '''Scott Mitchell''' (smitch * mac com)
| |
| * '''Markus Neteler''' (neteler * itc it) (chair)
| |
| * '''Maciej Sieczka''' (tutey * o2 pl)
| |
| | |
| (see also [http://grass.itc.it/community/team.php GRASS team page])
| |
| | |
| Next step: Revise [http://freegis.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/grass6/rfc/RFC1_PSC.dox?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup RFC1] (Request For Comment) for the GRASS community to consider
| |
| | |
| == Status November 2006 ==
| |
| | |
| A [http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc dedicated GRASS-PSC mailing list] has been created. It is open to the public.
| |
| | |
| == Status December 2006 ==
| |
| | |
| The [[PSC]] has a [[PSC Agenda]] (more there).
| |
| | |
| [[Category: PSC]]
| |