SVN hosting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(GForge-SVN-Browser URL) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Historical document, please keep it.''' | |||
The goal is to move to SVN infrastructure for GRASS 7. The hosting of SVN needs to be discussed. A new repository has to be created in any case, despite its physical location. | The goal is to move to SVN infrastructure for GRASS 7. The hosting of SVN needs to be discussed. A new repository has to be created in any case, despite its physical location. | ||
== News == | |||
'''''October 2007: It has been decided to open the SVN at OSGeo''''' | |||
* Link to the [http://www.nabble.com/Motion%3A-migrate-to-SVN-trac-on-OSGeo-infrastructure-tf4633839.html PSC mailing list thread] discussing this. | |||
See also bug [[Tracking]]. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Migration from CVS to SVN]] (technical issues) | |||
* <strike>[http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/ticket/5241/mediawiki2trac.ph Convert] MediaWiki pages to Trac</strike> | |||
: MediaWiki is available at OSGeo, so this shouldn't be needed. (and I prefer MediaWiki ;-) --HB) | |||
:: Note: there is now also the Mediawiki converter plugin installed at osgeo.org (but I tend to agree with HB) -- MN | |||
:: What does that plugin do? TracWiki->Mediawiki? | |||
::: yes -- MN | |||
:: If so Mw->Tw->Mw would be lossy & better to copy Mw->Mw? (??) --HB | |||
::: Sure, if we keep MW, we'll simply dump it and import -- MN | |||
== SVN repository with GForge at Intevation == | == SVN repository with GForge at Intevation == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 30: | ||
* GForge includes different SCMs, like CVS, SVN, Mercurial, ... | * GForge includes different SCMs, like CVS, SVN, Mercurial, ... | ||
** GForge-SVN-Browser ([http://wald.intevation.org/scm/?group_id=27 example]) | ** GForge-SVN-Browser ([http://wald.intevation.org/scm/?group_id=27 example]) | ||
** As GForge-Wiki "phpwiki" is potentially available. | |||
** more? | ** more? | ||
'''Contra:''' | '''Contra:''' | ||
* GForge is not really accepted by GRASS developers, low usage (much lower than with old RT). Important developers are not even registered at all | * GForge is not really accepted by GRASS developers, low usage (much lower than with old RT). Important developers are not even registered at all | ||
* [[Tracking#Buggy_bugtracker.3F|more GForge bugs]] | * [[Tracking#Buggy_bugtracker.3F|more GForge bugs]] | ||
| Line 43: | Line 63: | ||
'''Contra:''' | '''Contra:''' | ||
* some time already invested in Intevation's GForge | * some time already invested in Intevation's GForge | ||
[[Category: Development]] | [[Category: Development]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:51, 7 February 2019
Historical document, please keep it.
The goal is to move to SVN infrastructure for GRASS 7. The hosting of SVN needs to be discussed. A new repository has to be created in any case, despite its physical location.
News
October 2007: It has been decided to open the SVN at OSGeo
- Link to the PSC mailing list thread discussing this.
See also bug Tracking.
See also
- Migration from CVS to SVN (technical issues)
Convert MediaWiki pages to Trac
- MediaWiki is available at OSGeo, so this shouldn't be needed. (and I prefer MediaWiki ;-) --HB)
- Note: there is now also the Mediawiki converter plugin installed at osgeo.org (but I tend to agree with HB) -- MN
- What does that plugin do? TracWiki->Mediawiki?
- yes -- MN
- If so Mw->Tw->Mw would be lossy & better to copy Mw->Mw? (??) --HB
- Sure, if we keep MW, we'll simply dump it and import -- MN
SVN repository with GForge at Intevation
GRASS GForge Server: http://wald.intevation.org/tracker/?group_id=21
Pro:
- continuity for GRASS
- GForge includes different SCMs, like CVS, SVN, Mercurial, ...
- GForge-SVN-Browser (example)
- As GForge-Wiki "phpwiki" is potentially available.
- more?
Contra:
- GForge is not really accepted by GRASS developers, low usage (much lower than with old RT). Important developers are not even registered at all
- more GForge bugs
SVN repository with Trac at OSGeo
OSGeo SVN/Trac Server: http://trac.osgeo.org/ . There are several SVN/Trac instances running, e.g. the GDAL SVN/Trac Server.
Main servers are at Peer1 colocation site, adminstered by the OSGeo System Administration Committee (OSGeo-SAC).
Pro:
- Integrated infrastructure with other OSGeo projects (GDAL, ...)
- SVN and Trac nicely integrated, also Wiki integrated (Wiki example)
- Trac shows patches/diffs in SVN (example1, example2)
- login (signon) embedded in OSGeo LDAP: single signon for OSGeo infrastructure
- Trac advantages
- Timeline and roadmap provided for semi-automated release management (milestones)
- Auto-generation of release notes (GDAL example) which we currently do by hand for thousands of fixes
- Source code browser integrated | Alternative viewcvs interface for SVN
- Wiki integrated
- Ticket notification in IRC channel and via RSS
- tickets can moved around among OSGeo projects
- easy ticket monitoring and retrieval
- nice layout
- potential new translation portal of OSGeo would integrate, too (we suggest pootle)
- integration with BuildBot (automated multi-platform test builds)
Contra:
- some time already invested in Intevation's GForge