Performance comparison GRASS vs. ArcGIS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
⚠️Wenzeslaus (talk | contribs) (add see also section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}} | {{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}} | ||
{{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}} | {{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}} | ||
== See also == | |||
* [[GRASS GIS Performance]] | |||
Revision as of 21:52, 3 January 2019
Vector buffer (special case)
- Task: Create buffer around vector polygon with negative distance
- Input data: Vector layer 'StatPolygon' from ArcCR500 dataset
- Comparison: Windows Server Enterprise • Intel Xeon CPU E5520 2.27GHz 2.26GHz (2 processors) • 8GB • 64bit OS
- GRASS 7:
v.buffer input=StatPolygon output=Stat_5000 distance=-5000→ 12sec - ArcGIS 10.2.0:
Buffer StatPolygon Stat_5000 "-5000 Meters" FULL ROUND NONE→ 6min 50sec
- GRASS 7:
