PSC Agenda: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(migration) |
(fix) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==== Motions ==== | ==== Motions ==== | ||
''These entries need a vote from | ''These entries need a vote from the committee members.'' | ||
* Motion to [http://www.nabble.com/Motion%3A-migrate-to-SVN-trac-on-OSGeo-infrastructure-tf4633839.html migrate] CVS/bugtracker to OSGeo | |||
==== Discussions ==== | ==== Discussions ==== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
==== Motions ==== | ==== Motions ==== | ||
* <strike>[[RFC1]] Project Steering Committee guidelines- originally moved March 22, was edited and then a new motion for a vote issued April 1 (adopted April 5) [http://mpa.itc.it/markus/grass63progman/rfc/rfc1_psc.html HTML version of CVS file]</strike> | * <strike>[[RFC1]] Project Steering Committee guidelines- originally moved March 22, was edited and then a new motion for a vote issued April 1 (adopted April 5) [http://mpa.itc.it/markus/grass63progman/rfc/rfc1_psc.html HTML version of CVS file]</strike> | ||
* <strike>CVS write access to S. Pallecchi (granted, 12 Dec 2006)</strike> | * <strike>CVS write access to S. Pallecchi (granted, 12 Dec 2006)</strike> | ||
Revision as of 22:06, 18 October 2007
This page contains the agenda of the GRASS Project Steering Commitee.
Open issues
Motions
These entries need a vote from the committee members.
- Motion to migrate CVS/bugtracker to OSGeo
Discussions
These entries do not need a formal vote.
- License issues of translation support through Rosetta - alternatively consider pootle (maybe on OSGeo infrastructure)
Resolved issues
Motions
RFC1 Project Steering Committee guidelines- originally moved March 22, was edited and then a new motion for a vote issued April 1 (adopted April 5) HTML version of CVS fileCVS write access to S. Pallecchi (granted, 12 Dec 2006)PSC Chair motion (chair: M Neteler, 9 Dec 2006, see related email message)CVS write access to R. Antolin (granted, 8 Dec 2006)RFC2 - Legal aspects of code contributions (adopted 8 Dec 2006)
Discussions
- GRASS on koders.com: recommendation to do so. Now available here
- Add GRASS to Canonical's Rosetta translation project?
- Unresolved issue: a translation is a derivative and non-original work, and Canonical demands BSD-style copyright assignment of translations submitted through them (but not translations coming from the project). Could a translation back to english from one of those be a end-run around our copyright and the GPL?
- Update 2007: It appears that Canonical changed their Terms of use of Rosetta
See also
- List of RFCs and Motions