PSC Agenda: Difference between revisions

From GRASS-Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (url fix)
Line 7: Line 7:
''These entries need a vote from the committee members.''
''These entries need a vote from the committee members.''


* RFC3: http://download.osgeo.org/grass/grass6_progman/rfc/rfc3_psc.html (rewrite needed)
* RFC3: http://grass.osgeo.org/programming6/rfc3_psc.html (rewrite needed)


==== Discussions ====
==== Discussions ====

Revision as of 11:01, 29 October 2012

This page contains the agenda of the GRASS Project Steering Commitee.

Open issues

Motions

These entries need a vote from the committee members.

Discussions

These entries do not need a formal vote.

  • License issues of translation support through Rosetta - alternatively consider pootle (maybe on OSGeo infrastructure)

Resolved issues

Motions

2008

  • SVN write access to Ivan Shmakov (granted, 6 Feb 2008)

2007

  • SVN write access to Eric Patton as documentation manager (granted, 24 Nov 2007)
  • Motion to migrate CVS/bugtracker to OSGeo (passed, 22 Oct 2007)
  • CVS write access to P. Marcondes for PT translations (granted, 2 June 2007)
  • RFC1 Project Steering Committee guidelines- originally moved March 22, was edited and then a new motion for a vote issued April 1 (adopted April 5 2007) HTML version of SVN file

2006

  • CVS write access to S. Pallecchi (granted, 12 Dec 2006)
  • PSC Chair motion (chair: M Neteler, 9 Dec 2006, see related email message)
  • CVS write access to R. Antolin (granted, 8 Dec 2006)
  • [1] - Legal aspects of code contributions (adopted 8 Dec 2006)

Discussions

  • GRASS on koders.com: recommendation to do so. Now available here

  • Add GRASS to Canonical's Rosetta translation project?
Unresolved issue: a translation is a derivative and non-original work, and Canonical demands BSD-style copyright assignment of translations submitted through them (but not translations coming from the project). Could a translation back to english from one of those be a end-run around our copyright and the GPL?
Update 2007: It appears that Canonical changed their Terms of use of Rosetta

See also