Performance comparison GRASS vs. ArcGIS: Difference between revisions

From GRASS-Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add see also section)
(+Clipping Contest Benchmark)
Line 11: Line 11:
{{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}}
{{fig|buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)|size=640}}
{{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}}
{{fig|arcgis-buffer-negative-distance|Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)|size=640}}
== Clipping Contest Benchmark ==
ContourClipTest with ArcGIS, QGIS, GlobalMapper, Manifold, JGRASS ... (tests done in 2011):
https://courses.neteler.org/arcgis-vs-qgis-etc-clipping-contest-rematch-revisited/


== See also ==
== See also ==


* [[GRASS GIS Performance]]
* [[GRASS GIS Performance]]

Revision as of 16:29, 4 January 2019

Vector buffer (special case)

Task: Create buffer around vector polygon with negative distance
Input data: Vector layer 'StatPolygon' from ArcCR500 dataset
Comparison: Windows Server Enterprise • Intel Xeon CPU E5520 2.27GHz 2.26GHz (2 processors) • 8GB • 64bit OS
  • GRASS 7: v.buffer input=StatPolygon output=Stat_5000 distance=-5000 → 12sec
  • ArcGIS 10.2.0: Buffer StatPolygon Stat_5000 "-5000 Meters" FULL ROUND NONE → 6min 50sec
Vector buffer with negative distance (GRASS)
Vector buffer with negative distance (ArcGIS)


Clipping Contest Benchmark

ContourClipTest with ArcGIS, QGIS, GlobalMapper, Manifold, JGRASS ... (tests done in 2011):

https://courses.neteler.org/arcgis-vs-qgis-etc-clipping-contest-rematch-revisited/

See also