SVN hosting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+release notes) |
(→SVN repository with Trac at OSGeo: contra (mediawiki2trac)) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
'''Contra:''' | '''Contra:''' | ||
* some time already invested in Intevation's GForge | * some time already invested in Intevation's GForge | ||
* [http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracFaq#can-i-convert-mediawiki-pages-to-trac convert] MediaWiki pages to Trac | |||
[[Category: Development]] | [[Category: Development]] |
Revision as of 12:47, 12 September 2007
The goal is to move to SVN infrastructure for GRASS 7. The hosting of SVN needs to be discussed. A new repository has to be created in any case, despite its physical location.
SVN repository with GForge at Intevation
GRASS GForge Server: http://wald.intevation.org/tracker/?group_id=21
Pro:
- continuity for GRASS
Contra:
- GForge is not really accepted by GRASS developers, low usage (much lower than with old RT). Important developers are not even registered at all
- GForge is not integrated with CVS, apparently also not with SVN
- Wiki is yet on another server
SVN repository with Trac at OSGeo
OSGeo SVN/Trac Server: http://trac.osgeo.org/
GDAL SVN/Trac Server: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/
Pro:
- Integrated infrastructure with other OSGeo projects (GDAL, ...)
- SVN and Trac nicely integrated, also Wiki integrated
- Trac shows patches/diffs in SVN (example)
- login (signon) embedded in OSGeo LDAP: single signon for OSGeo infrastructure
- Trac advantages
- Timeline and roadmap provided for semi-automated release management (milestones)
- Auto-generation of release notes (GDAL example) which we currently do by hand for thousands of fixes
- Source code browser integrated
- Wiki integrated
- tickets can moved around among OSGeo projects
- easy ticket monitoring and retrieval
- nice layout
- potential new translation portal of OSGeo would integrate, too
Contra:
- some time already invested in Intevation's GForge
- convert MediaWiki pages to Trac